AntiGravity Inertial Shielding Analysis
by Jack Sarfati, Ph.D.
JACK's Email Response to My Letter
Hi Jack,I am confused by the description of Shamir Banarjee of space-time warps in front and back of a vehicle that calls for compression in front and expansion in back.It’s all simple math - you cannot use your verbal intuition here - it’s counter intuitive.Can use Schwarzschild solutiong00 = 1/(1 - 2GM/c^2r)When M > 0 attractive gravity contracts space causing gravity redshiftWhen M < 0 repulsive anti-gravity expands space causing anti-gravity blue shift.Opposing motional Doppler - a different effect do not confuse with gravity shift and do not confuse with cosmological shift - Jim Woodward made this mistake.
Math details in Wikipoopia below
--- Forwarded Message -----From: shomir banerjee <email@example.com>Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020, 06:30:10 AM EDTSubject: Warp Drive
Miguel Alcubierre, in 1994, presented the mathematical construction that allows for the possibility of a theoretical vessel to travel at speeds faster than the speed of light, while preserving a normal spacetime in the vicinity of the vessel, thus avoiding time-dilation.  Here is a graphic to explain it. This is a 3D presentation of a 2D spacetime plane that has been warped in opposite directions around an un-warped middle circular area.
The theoretical vessel would sit in the middle of the graph, its engine creating a compressed spacetime in the direction of travel relative to the vessel, and an expanded spacetime in the rear, thus maintaining an overall conserved spacetime curvature, like surfing on a wave, or falling continuously forward. The energy required to create these warps of spacetime are on the order of the Einstein non-inertial mass of the planet Jupiter, by some estimates, which is clearly unimaginable to achieve, even if our ability to confine anti-matter were dramatically improved, (beyond the single atoms that have thus far been confined for femtoseconds). Therefore, some other physics concept must be developed, which is described.
Would space-time compression in front cause a realtime inverse or expansion (drop) of sound frequencies, while causing a space-time expansion in back with an inverse or compression (rise) of sound frequencies?
That’s what the above math says. That’s what I said a jillion jillion times already. "God is a mathematician" (Norbert Weiner) explains the “Unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the physical world” (Eugene Wigner).
Or would the negative-refraction meta-material hull of the craft be responsible for all of the Reverse Doppler sound effect?
Yes, because gravity is universal ALL waves EM, gravity, sound (if air), elastic inside - feel same Ricci compression/expansion + Weyl conformal vacuum stretch-squeeze curvature tensor fields in the same way - this is a corollary to the Einstein Equivalence Principle (EEP).
BTW a Contactee friend of mine says she thought she saw you aboard a ship recently with other physicists - a Secret Space Force ship, I think.
Clearly in my future as it has not happened yet. ;-)
This sci fi book below written by a time traveler from our future appeared about 30 years ago; note how he mentions me and Aspect.
This website was constructed on 7 October 2020.
Last updated on 10/16/2020.
Copyright Bruce Cornet 2020.